June 19, 2008 at 1:46 pm
· Filed under Agricultural Biotechnology, Consumer Attitudes About Biotechnology, Science & Education
By Jeremy Cooke
BBC News*
I have to confess, until now the whole debate about genetically-modified (GM) food has pretty much passed me by.
Most of my career has been spent as a foreign correspondent.
But last summer I returned to the UK to start a new job with the BBC. I now glory in the title Rural Affairs Correspondent.
Read the rest of this entry »
April 22, 2008 at 9:19 am
· Filed under Consumer Attitudes About Biotechnology, The Food System, Science & Education
Dave Natzke
Published in Midwest Dairy Business (April 2008)
More vertical integration, what many consider the “evil empire” afflicting segments of food production, is headed toward dairy. As in other industries, most vertical integration pressure will come from the top down, in an effort to squeeze as much money out of incremental margins as possible. But in an evolving business climate, I think more dairy pressure will ultimately come from the bottom up.
Read the rest of this entry »
April 22, 2008 at 9:17 am
· Filed under The Food System, Science & Education
Dave Natzke
Published in Midwest Dairy Business (February 2008)
The buzzword at the International Dairy Foods Association’s Dairy Forum ’08 was “sustainability.” While the word gives everyone a warm and fuzzy feeling they’re doing something – anything – to make the world a better place to live, the definition of “sustainability” can be elusive and confusing. Many Dairy Forum speakers used the term to cover environmental and social aspects of milk and dairy product production, packaging and transportation. Read the rest of this entry »
April 18, 2008 at 3:27 pm
· Filed under Consumer Attitudes About Biotechnology, rbST Public Discussion, Science & Education
Terry D. Etherton
The International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) recently has issued two contradictory press releases (see below) that relate to labeling of milk and dairy products. In one, they promote absence claim labeling; in the other they propose labels are not needed.
IDFA supports the use of deceptive absence labels in the rbST-free milk market battle! However, they are opposed to labels on ultra-filtered (UF) milk used in cheesemaking because those labels may confuse the consumer!
Read the rest of this entry »
April 17, 2008 at 1:50 pm
· Filed under PodCasts, The Food System, Science & Education
Terry D. Etherton
Two outstanding podcasts are posted on DairyCast.com. Enjoy listening to these thought provoking presentations on:
- Cloning: where have we been and where are we today? Gary Crawford, USDA, summarizes recent developments from USDA and FDA
- Bruce Vincent, Multiple Generation Environmental Steward and Logger from Libby, MT, shares an empowering presentation on activists, grizzly bears and the logging industry. There are interesting parallels to today’s dairy industry
cdn3.libsyn.com/trufflemedia/080307_DairyCast_0139.mp3
April 2, 2008 at 5:50 pm
· Filed under Agricultural Biotechnology, Consumer Attitudes About Biotechnology, rbST Public Discussion, Science & Education
SHERRY BUNTING
Published in Farmshine (March 28, 2008 Issue)
Dairymen respond to Wal-Mart’s “Great Value”
Wal-Mart announced this week that its Great Value milk brand now sources milk exclusively from cows not treated with rbST. Milk selections at Sam’s Club are also offered from suppliers sourcing milk from non-supplemented cows.
With this announcement came a report on Wal-Mart’s blogging website, where Rand Waddoups, “author for sustainability” writes about several new “sustainability-related” initiatives at Wal-Mart, including this recent change for Great Value milk.
Read the rest of this entry »
April 2, 2008 at 4:24 pm
· Filed under Agricultural Biotechnology, Consumer Attitudes About Biotechnology, rbST Public Discussion, Science & Education
Posted on Truth About Trade & Technology
April 2, 2008
Sixty-six university dairy and veterinary scientists launched a broad attack Monday against milk processors and retail marketers who increasingly seek to advertise and label milk produced by cows not treated with Monsanto’s recombinant bovine somatotropin. A letter from professors at nearly every major land grant university asserted there was no difference between conventional and “rBST-free” or organic milk but that consumers were being misled by emotional advertising claims to pay higher prices.
Read the rest of this entry »
March 3, 2008 at 5:10 pm
· Filed under Agricultural Biotechnology, Science & Education
Henry I. Miller and Gregory Conko
Washington Times (February 29, 2008)
European Union officials adamantly refuse to let the World Trade Organization save them from themselves.
Despite a 2005 WTO ruling that some European countries were breaking international trade rules by prohibiting the importation of gene-spliced, or “genetically modified (GM),” crops and foods, Europe remains recalcitrant, unrepentant and on the verge of slaughtering its own livestock industry. Read the rest of this entry »
February 21, 2008 at 7:27 pm
· Filed under rbST Public Discussion, Science & Education
By SHERRY BUNTING
Special for Farmshine
LANCASTER, Pa. – “They’ve heard the lies, now it’s time they hear from the farmers,” said Pennsylvania dairyman Tom Krall during the second day of the Dairy Summit here on February 7. Krall-View Farm, Lebanon County, is home to a 100-cow milking herd.
Krall, along with DairyBusiness publisher Joel Hastings presented information about the new producer organization: American Farmers for the Advancement and Conservation of Technology (AFACT). Read the rest of this entry »
February 21, 2008 at 7:07 pm
· Filed under rbST Public Discussion, Science & Education
Terry D. Etherton
Protect consumer choice:In the marketplace it is important that consumers have the right to buy milk produced by the most efficient, safe and sanitary methods of dairy farm management practices and production technologies that are available,and priced to reflect these efficiencies. Read the rest of this entry »